MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, more straightforward to write, much easier to read.
working experience, contacts, at work skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are two times as likely to find employment…..
Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and private sector, helps student decide on future before committing long haul, EG 1/6 students will alter their advanced schooling course while at uni….
Lots of people genuinely believe that it is better to learn something in a combined group rather than individually. Do you agree or disagree?
Agree – learning in group has advantages that are many of teamwork could be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise
Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not dependant on others
more aged way, more responsible
Topic and Answer: Education (child)
Some people genuinely believe that children should do organised activities in their spare time although some believe that children must certanly be able to do what they want to complete within their spare time. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to guide your answer.
PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting your brain wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do what they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent studies also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it will be unfair for this minority.
PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the school
-need time to plan
-possible ‘equipment’ to shop for
-furthermore studies show that mental performance operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as for example studying.
Topic and Answer: Globalisation
Many individuals say that globalisation while the growing quantity of multinational companies have a negative impact on the environmental surroundings. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to aid your answer. As to what extent can you agree or disagree? Use reasons that are specific examples to support your role.
PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE SURROUNDINGS interaction that is-Increased countries
-Increase in products or services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop of the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these can have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP Gulf of Mexico, oil spill, destroyed the local ecosystem…
Scientists genuinely believe that to be able to protect the environmental surroundings, people must use less energy within their lives that are daily. However, most people never have changed the way they live. Why do you believe many people have never taken individual action? What might be done to encourage them to take action?
Ideas for body paragraph 1
Not taken action that is individual:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy associated with the commons
– Collective problem – much easier to shirk responsibility
Ideas for body paragraph 2
What could possibly be done to encourage them to take action?
– Media campaigns by the federal government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……
Some think that may be the responsibility of individuals to manage the environmental surroundings. Others say it’s the government that should be careful of the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
People should care for the environmental surroundings because:
We are the consumers, we vote with this wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage need help writing essay patch)
Government should care for the environment because:
They have the power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
said to be guardians for the country, which means that collectively these are typically guardians of this earth… yet not true in reality
Both should always be doing more!
In several countries small shops and town centers are going away from business, because people have a tendency to drive to the large stores that are out-of-town. This results in a rise in car use, and it also means that people without cars have limited usage of stores that are out-of-town. Do you think benefits of such development outweigh its disadvantages?